cultural history – The Posted Past

When Abraham Lincoln signed legislation in 1864 protecting Yosemite Valley, few Americans had seen its wonders firsthand. The journey was arduous, expensive, and often dangerous. But photographs and artistic renderings began circulating, capturing public imagination. Carleton Watkins’ mammoth plate photographs of Yosemite’s towering cliffs and Albert Bierstadt’s luminous paintings suggested something almost mythical: a uniquely American paradise, waiting to be experienced.

By the 1880s, the Southern Pacific Railroad had begun marketing Yosemite as a must-see destination. Their promotional materials featured romantic images of pristine wilderness alongside luxury dining cars and comfortable accommodations. The message was clear: you could experience the sublime while maintaining the comforts of civilization. The railroad’s campaign to “See America First” tapped into both patriotic sentiment and growing concern about wealthy Americans choosing European vacations over domestic travel.

Stephen Mather, who would become the first director of the National Park Service in 1916, understood the power of imagery. A self-made millionaire from the borax industry, he approached park promotion with a marketer’s eye. Mather encouraged photographers to set up studios in Yosemite and actively supported the production of high-quality postcards, which he called his “little missionaries.” These cards, purchased for pennies and mailed across the country, did more than any official campaign to make Yosemite a part of the American imagination.

The postcards reveal changing patterns in how Americans experienced their parks. Early images show well-dressed visitors on guided tours, often on horseback. By the 1920s, automobiles appear, marking a democratic shift in park access. The famous Wawona Tree tunnel, carved through a giant sequoia in 1881, became a must-have photo opportunity. Each car passing through represented a family making their own way through the park, free to explore at their own pace.

The National Park Service itself emerged from a uniquely American compromise. Progressive Era conservationists like John Muir had argued for pure preservation, while others saw the parks as natural resources to be utilized. The 1916 Organic Act that created the NPS threaded this needle by mandating both conservation and public access – the parks would be preserved unimpaired, but explicitly for the enjoyment of the people.

This dual mandate shaped how Americans came to view their relationship with nature. The parks weren’t distant wilderness to be admired from afar, but rather public spaces to be actively experienced. In the 1930s Civilian Conservation Corps workers built trails and facilities, making the parks more accessible while maintaining their natural character. The message was clear: these were the people’s parks, and the people would help maintain them.

The advent of color photography in the 1940s and 50s brought new vibrancy to park imagery. Postcards from this era capture the brilliant white of dogwood blooms along mountain streams, the deep red of sequoia bark, and the rainbow mist of Yosemite Falls. The images suggested that black and white photography, no matter how artistic, had never quite captured the true glory of these places.

By the mid-20th century, the success of the national parks as tourist destinations began creating new challenges. Bumper-to-bumper traffic in Yosemite Valley became an ironic commentary on Americans’ enthusiasm for their natural heritage. The park service faced growing tension between access and preservation, leading to innovations like shuttle systems and visitor quotas.

Yet the fundamental appeal of the parks remained unchanged. Whether arriving by horse, train, automobile, or tour bus, visitors came seeking what Frederick Law Olmsted had described in his 1865 report on Yosemite, “The union of the deepest sublimity with the deepest beauty of nature.” The parks offered not just scenic views but a connection to something larger than themselves – a uniquely American inheritance.

Today’s visitors to Yosemite might share their experiences through Instagram rather than postcards, but they’re participating in the same tradition of witnessing and sharing America’s natural wonders. The early promoters of the national parks understood something fundamental: seeing these places wasn’t enough. The experience had to be shared to become part of our collective identity.

Those early postcards, with their hand-tinted colors and earnest captions, did more than advertise scenic views. They helped Americans understand these distant wonders as their own inheritance – places that belonged to everyone and therefore needed everyone’s protection. When we look at them today, we’re seeing how Americans fell in love with their national parks, and how that love affair helped define our relationship with the natural world.

The history of Yosemite and the National Park Service reminds us that conservation isn’t just about preserving scenic views. It’s about maintaining spaces where each generation can discover their own connection to the natural world. This fundamental mission remains as relevant as ever. The parks still offer what those early postcards promised: a chance to see the natural wonders of the United States, and to share the experience with friends and family miles away.

This masterpiece of meta-humor was the centerpiece of “Nutty Notices,” a collection of satirical postcards published by Philadelphia’s GEM Publishing in 1964. The series went on to skewer everything from traffic enforcement to mattress tags, each card delivering bureaucratic absurdity like a stage clown wielding a rubber chicken.

Perfect for the spooky season, the next notice solemnly announces the recipient has won in an “Imminent Danger Sweepstakes” sponsored by a “Black Cat Society,” reassuring that previous recipients survived their subsequent accidents.

The collection unfolds like a greatest hits of paperwork problems. Another, from the stern-sounding “Bureau of Upholstery Tag Security,” threatens dawn raids over a removed mattress tag. A mock inheritance notice dangles a too-good-to-be-true fortune from a conveniently deceased fifth cousin, key details lost to a faulty typewriter.

These parodies emerged during a period of notable government expansion. The Great Society legislation of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations had launched numerous new agencies and programs, from the Peace Corps to Medicare. While many of these programs were popular, and have endured, they also generated unprecedented levels of paperwork and official communications in Americans’ daily lives.

The notices cleverly played on specific anxieties of the era: fear of government surveillance, concerns about traffic enforcement in the new Interstate era, and awareness of inheritance scams in an increasingly connected society.

The traffic violation notice, featuring President Lyndon B. Johnson, plays on LBJ’s notorious driving habits. The President was known for terrifying guests at his Texas ranch by driving his Amphicar (a German-made civilian amphibious vehicle) at high speeds toward the ranch’s lake, screaming about brake failure as his car plunged into the water. The vehicle was designed to float, but his unsuspecting passengers didn’t know that. This well-known presidential prank made the postcard’s joke particularly resonant with 1960s readers.

A good pun is still a kind of social capital, as all deadpanning dads know. The card below suggests an incredible win. The 1964 Plymouth Barracuda was a coveted car model, though overshadowed that year by the introduction of the Ford Mustang. The Barracuda featured a sloped fastback roofline and fold-down rear seats that created a large cargo area, making it both sporty and practical. The standard engine was a Slant-6, but buyers could opt for a more powerful V8 engine. Prices started at around $2,500 (approximately $22,000 in today’s dollars). By the end of the card, though, it’s all a bit fishy.

What makes these 1964 parodies fundamentally different from today’s deceptive communications is their clear satirical intent. The notices were obviously humorous, from their outlandish premises to their absurd escalations. They never attempted to deceive. The parodies didn’t seek to extract money, personal information, or action from recipients. The joke was the endpoint, and publishers and recipients understood these as entertainment, part of a broader tradition of bureaucratic satire.

Today’s deceptive communications often weaponize the same official-looking formats and bureaucratic language that these postcards once parodied. But modern scams aim to deceive rather than amuse, exploiting digital tools to create ever more convincing forgeries. Contemporary examples like phishing emails represent a darker evolution of institutional mimicry. While the 1964 notices laughed at authority’s pomposities, today’s deceptive communications abuse institutional authority for malicious purposes.

Long before memes spread political humor online, postcards served as a democratic medium for both serious political discourse and satirical commentary. During the Golden Age of postcards before World War I, suffragettes used them to promote women’s voting rights. The famous “Vinegar Valentines” of the Victorian era delivered stinging social critique through the mail. During World War II, patriotic postcards boosted morale while propaganda postcards spread messages both noble and nefarious.

These vintage parodies remind us that healthy skepticism toward official communications isn’t new—but the stakes have changed dramatically. In 1964, Americans could laugh at mock notices because real ones, while annoying, generally came through trusted channels with clear verification methods. Today’s digital landscape requires a more sophisticated type of visual and contextual literacy. We must balance healthy skepticism with the ability to recognize legitimate communications, while remaining alert to increasingly sophisticated forms of deception.

The “Nutty Notices” stand as charming artifacts of a time when bureaucratic busy-ness seemed worthy of laughter rather than alarm—when the worst thing a notice might do was create a paradox, not steal your identity. In an era of digital manipulation, we can look back nostalgically at a time when the most threatening official communication you might receive was a tongue-in-cheek warning about your mattress tags.